Trend Continues Toward McCall
Alan Hevesi and Elliot Spitzer Sweeping in Their State Races
Governor Pataki's lead over H. Carl McCall has dropped again in the public
polls. In the new Quinnipiac poll the spread between Pataki -- who is ahead with
46% of the vote among likely voters to McCall's 35% -- has dropped to 11 points.
At the same time, Thomas Golisano moved up to 14%. In upstate urban areas the
race is a nail-biter with 36% for Pataki, 32% for McCall, and 29% for Golisano.
The spread between Pataki and McCall has shrunk from a consistent 30 points
all year . . . to 15 points in a Marist poll at the beginning of September
. . . to only 11 points in the most recent poll. Going forward, a drop of just
two points a week for Pataki could give McCall the win.
If you are a Democratic contender who has run before, you get a boost in a
statewide race -- unless your opponent has a great deal of money for a large
media campaign. This is proving to be true in the race for the open State
Comptroller seat and for the incumbent Elliot Spitzer in the Attorney General
race.
In a new Q-poll Alan Hevesi enjoys a commanding lead, 50 to 30, against state
Assemblyman John Faso. As a city candidate, Hevesi, former New York City
Comptroller and mayoral candidate, launched media campaigns, partially paid for
with city matching funds, that gave him enormous name recognition not just in
the city (which accounts for a third of the statewide vote) but also in the
suburban portion of the New York market, an additional quarter of the state's
voters. The city's campaign finance law gives a government-paid-for advantage to
citywide candidates who later run statewide.
There was never much suspense in the Attorney General race. Spitzer has not
only run before, he has received a great deal of coverage and a substantial
reputation for his aggressive and competent actions as the state's lawyer. The
spread in this race is a very comfortable 39 points. Spitzer is likely to move
to higher office in the future based on his actions as AG and his success at the
polls.
The Governor is in a two-front war. He is being forced to neglect his
long-running campaign to acquire Democratic constituencies -- which has involved
proposing new spending initiatives and drifting to the left in the public policy
debate -- to fend off the attack on his right. This gives McCall an opportunity
to grow by both increasing Democratic turnout and making an appeal to
moderate-to-left voters that Pataki is being forced by Golisano to neglect.
Upstate, McCall is doing well in urban areas and Golisano has been softening
up Pataki's vote generally. Golisano is doing particularly well in rural areas
and in Rochester. Like Senators Schumer and Clinton, McCall is making inroads
upstate because the economy and job prospects have been poor. The difference is
that Golisano is also receiving votes here and increasing turnout among voters
hostile to the Governor.
McCall has gained among Democrats, who now back him more than two-to-one,
which is significant since Democrats outnumber Republicans five-to-three on the
voter roles. As the race tightens up you can expect a much bigger Democratic
turnout than the public polls project. In recent presidential, mayoral, and
gubernatorial races the vote was either not close enough for some Democrats to
bother to show up, or they were disgruntled and stayed home. Not this time.
Expect a high turnout among Democrats.
Pataki's favorable rating has not changed much despite the pounding he has
been taking. McCall has seen his favorable position improve even though his
campaign has had less money and has been under attack by Team Pataki. McCall
moved from 23% favorability in July to 30%, an improvement of seven points.
Did Golisano make it a horse race? Will the polls help McCall raise the
needed money? Can the Democrats end up with all five statewide offices? More
later.