Tribal Politics
Can the Republicans Play the Game as Well as the Democrats?
Political consultants talk about New York's "tribal politics." At
first, it sounds very un-PC. No one in the politically correct speech game (like
the Board of Regents before their rewrite-famous-authors scandal) would ever
talk that way. But a little history will take the edge off of the subject.
After the Revolutionary War, men who served as officers in Washington's
Continental Army and their sons were eligible to join the Society of Cincinnati,
an elite group that was aligned with the Federalist Party. Other men were left
to join the Tammany Society, which, at the beginning, was not a political group
but a fraternal organization.
Tammany was an imaginary Indian chief. Local groups used pseudo-Indian names,
officials had fake Indian ranks and the members often dressed in Indian garb at
events -- thus the tribal beginnings. Ironically, Tammany's first celebration in
New York City was a Columbus Day event before there were Catholics or Italians
in any numbers here. Later, the Tammany Society became associated with the
Democratic Party when it formed. Democratic headquarters on 14th Street was
called Tammany Hall.
At first, the reaction to immigrants was hostile. Tammany was a nativist
group in its early days. Politicians like Boss William M. Tweed noticed the
waves of immigrants as they came into the city, though, and saw them as an
opportunity for political organizing. Each wave of newcomers was treated like a
new Indian tribe and were brought into the Democratic Party and treated as a
group. Needless to say, the immigrant groups became powerful voting blocs -- the
root of "tribal politics."
Old habits are hard to break and the Democrats still play that game with
newcomers. Republicans are learning. They are now smarter about ethnic and
immigrant identity than they were even ten years ago, and they are now giving
Democrats a run for their money in that area. Governor George Pataki's moves in
recent years into the Hispanic and other immigrant communities are an expression
of that activity.
This kind of politics also shows up in the favorite-son campaigns. Fernando
Ferrer in the last two mayoral races used it, for example. Undoubtedly, Carl
McCall will use the racial heritage version this year in the governor's race.
When candidates are perceived as equally acceptable or when there is little
information about either candidate, racial, ethnic or national background
becomes an important consideration in voting.
The tradition of political parties and candidates working ethnic or national
groups is so ingrained that candidates often miss another historical trend. As
waves of immigrants die off and second, third, and fourth generations of
hyphenated Americans dominate a group, members start to drop ethnic identity in
polls and census responses. This was again seen in the 2000 Census. Not only do
groups intermarry, they shed their national and ethnic identities as the origins
become diffuse and distant.
Over time, this makes religion a much more important factor in voting. For
instance, Peter Vallone in the last mayor's race and Andrew Cuomo in this years
governor's race have, when voters have scant information, received excess
support among Hispanic voters due largely to their religion, in this case
Catholicism. This is something Ferrer neglected in both his races for mayor. He
was so heavily invested in a favorite-son candidacy that he failed to get the
default Catholic vote he should have received.
It should not be like this, but New York City is an expensive market so it is
hard for merit and accomplishment to break through the airwaves. "Tribal
politics" makes a difference in the absence of information.
In the General Election, Pataki is more than just triangulating what have
been traditional Democratic issues. He will also continue to expand his base by
emphasizing environmental issues one week, education the next, and the drug laws
after that. Pataki's success, though, has also hinged on working various new
immigrant groups, especially Hispanics. He is quietly working Jewish voters as
well now. Later, depending on who wins the Democratic Primary, you can expect to
see him go after black voters, or more likely, he will make a major push to
attract Catholic voters (beyond Hispanics) if McCall wins the primary.
Will the Republican win the "tribal politics" game this year?
Can Democrats come together after the Primary and take back their traditional
base with issue-voters? Are we in for a major political realignment in New York
City with the Republicans gaining a solid footing in the city? More later.